<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cake Central Message Board Melts Down Over Budget Bride Blog Comments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weddingmarketing.net/2009/06/20/cake-central-message-board-melts-budget-bride-blog-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weddingmarketing.net/2009/06/20/cake-central-message-board-melts-budget-bride-blog-comments/</link>
	<description>Wedding and bridal marketing, selling to the bride</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:50:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Ebon</title>
		<link>http://weddingmarketing.net/2009/06/20/cake-central-message-board-melts-budget-bride-blog-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-606</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Ebon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingmarketing.net/blog/?p=3377#comment-606</guid>
		<description>Sorry I missed it (just kidding)...

Having had to monitor message boards, myself, I&#039;m familiar with discussions getting out of hand. Usually, I found that contacting the offending parties directly and modifying or deleting their post (if absolutely necessary) would do the trick. It&#039;s not as simple as deleting an entire thread, but it doesn&#039;t appear so arbitrary.

Just my take... and I appreciate yours.

Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I missed it (just kidding)&#8230;</p>
<p>Having had to monitor message boards, myself, I&#8217;m familiar with discussions getting out of hand. Usually, I found that contacting the offending parties directly and modifying or deleting their post (if absolutely necessary) would do the trick. It&#8217;s not as simple as deleting an entire thread, but it doesn&#8217;t appear so arbitrary.</p>
<p>Just my take&#8230; and I appreciate yours.</p>
<p>Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Varika</title>
		<link>http://weddingmarketing.net/2009/06/20/cake-central-message-board-melts-budget-bride-blog-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Varika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 23:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weddingmarketing.net/blog/?p=3377#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Honestly?  Being an experienced Cake Central person, I tend to think that sometime last night, after you went to bed, people started name-slinging at each other and the thread degenerated into hysterical hissy fits.  Possibly the one avidly hateful poster from the other blog got in there, even; it&#039;s happened before.  And the discussion is no more at that point.  You never get it back on track.

I wish they would just lock a thread with a final post explaining why it was locked instead of deleting, but I guess that&#039;s too much work for so few mods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly?  Being an experienced Cake Central person, I tend to think that sometime last night, after you went to bed, people started name-slinging at each other and the thread degenerated into hysterical hissy fits.  Possibly the one avidly hateful poster from the other blog got in there, even; it&#8217;s happened before.  And the discussion is no more at that point.  You never get it back on track.</p>
<p>I wish they would just lock a thread with a final post explaining why it was locked instead of deleting, but I guess that&#8217;s too much work for so few mods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
